Looks like I will have some part-time legal work soon, doing real estate transactions, which is right up my alley. :) I kind of have a weird feeling about it, but I think it's just nerves. We'll see. Meanwhile, work = good.
Also, I'm going to be teaching a felted tote class at my LYS in Walnut Creek. I'm pretty excited about this. If this class works out, maybe I'll be able to teach some other stuff too. I enjoy knitting so much, and finally feel experienced enough to help other people pick up new skills. Plus it keeps me from being my usual hermity self.
Jeez this post is dull--I'm even boring myself. Lately I've been really feeling the need to DO something, something that matters, that I can look forward to accomplishing, that I can look back on in my elder years with pride. You know? Since I graduated from law school and passed the bar in 1990, I haven't really done anything that made me beam with pride. (We're leaving aside all motherhood issues here--if you have kid(s) you know what I mean, and if you don't, just trust me on this: it's not the same kind of pride.)
And the real problem is that I would need to choose something and stick with it--not change my mind midstream. I'm really good at getting things started, but unless I'm really passionate about the goal and/or the process to the goal, I'm not so good at the keeping-going or the finishing-up. And the fear of choosing the wrong thing or failing at whatever I choose is kind of keeping me from choosing anything at all.
Stupid, I know.
Does anyone else feel this way? Like you're just on an endless treatmill of working, paying the bills, taking care of your family, and trying to be sane/productive/not unhappy? Do I just need to up my dose of Zoloft? :)
Here's a cause I could get into: passing the ERA. Yep, you heard that right. I heard an interview with Ruth Bader Ginsberg last night on NPR, and she talked about the ERA as a symbol, an important one, that would acknowledge the equal place of women in our society. And I think she's right. Maybe it would be "only" symbolic, but I think justice is justice, and symbols ARE important.
Also, I've gotta think: who would vote against this? And why? If the Republican party can try to amend the Constitution to institutionalize bigotry against gays and lesbians, why can't we try to amend the Constitution to acknowledge the fundamental equality of men and women?
I'm just saying.
In other depressing news, I listened to most of the Gonzales confirmation hearing yesterday. For those of you that missed it, here's a paraphrase:
SENATOR: If confirmed as Attorney General of the United States, would you do X?
GONZALES: Well, you know, I would have to go down and confer with the attorneys in the Department of Justice about that and see what they have to say, and really do what is to be done in that situation.
SENATOR: Um, okay. Um, I'm not sure if you answered that question, really . . . [silence from witness] . . . Well. I'll move on, then. You are the head of the White House's Office of Legal Counsel, which issued a legal opinion setting this administration's policy with respect to torture and interrogation. This memo re-defined torture as "inflicting pain tantamount to that caused by organ failure or death," which basically exempts out (i.e., allows U.S. personnel to engage in) a lot of activities most reasonable people would consider to be torture. That remained the official (albeit secret) policy of the United States government for nearly 2 years, even after it was leaked to the press and made public, until shortly after the President nominated you for this position. Do you support torture, Mr. Gonzales? And as Attorney General, the highest law enforcement position in our country, will you continue to support it?
GONZALES: The Office of Legal Counsel developed that memorandum, and it was only addressed to me. I don't recall who requested it, and even if I did I wouldn't tell you. It's not my job to choose what actions the Defense Department will take, and basically I refuse to take responsibility for, or even acknowledge, anything I have ever said, written or done.
Seriously--his answer to almost every question was a long and obscure way of saying "I'm not going to tell you that; it's none of your business." That doesn't really inspire confidence, does it?
I love the way Maureen Dowd put it yesterday: "You know how bad the situation is when the president's choice for attorney general has to formally pledge not to support torture anymore."
Yeah, what she said.